Blog
Blog » 4 STEPS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN JUDGMENT IN HUNGARY
4 STEPS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN JUDGMENT IN HUNGARY
09 August 2023
Considering that more and more Hungarian companies trade with foreign companies around the world, the number of cross-border disputes is also rising. Consequently, it is becoming common for a Hungarian company to be sued abroad. But how can you enforce the foreign civil law judgments in Hungary?
Enforceable foreign judgments in Hungary
First, it is noted that from an enforcement perspective, there are 3 types of foreign civil law judgments:
- EU / EEA judgments;
- Foreign judgments recognised by bilateral treaty;
- Foreign judgments recognised by the Hungarian Privat International Law Act[1].
EU /EEA judgment
A civil or commercial law judgment made in the EU/EEA, the unique feature of these judgments that they are automatically recognised in Hungary without any intermediary procedure ('exequatur').
Foreign judgments recognised by bilateral treaty
Hungary has concluded several international treaties with other states which enables, under the conditions laid down in the treaty in question, the enforcement of the foreign civil law judgments in Hungary.
These countries are the followings: Albania, Algeria, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, China, Cuba, Egypt, Iraq, Kosovo, Moldova, North Korea, North Macedonia, Mongolia, Montenegro, Russia, Serbia, Syria, Tunisia, Ukraine, Vietnam.
Foreign judgments recognised by the Hungarian Privat International Law Act
If the EU regulation or the bilateral treaties are not applicable to determine whether a foreign court decision can be recognised in Hungary, the provisions of the Hungarian Private International Law Act (“PIL Act”) provide guidance.
The PIL Act provides that a foreign court decision shall be recognised if
- the jurisdiction of the proceeding foreign court is well-founded,
- the decision became final, and
- none of the reasons for refusal (e.g.: it would violate Hungarian public policy; res judicata etc.) is met.
It is noted that reciprocity between Hungary and the state of the court rendering the judgment shall be another requirement of the recognition of decisions rendered in proprietary matters except if a) the jurisdiction of Hungarian courts was excluded in the case, or b) the jurisdiction of the proceeding foreign court is based on an agreement between the parties which is in compliance with the provisions of Hungarian law.
4 Steps to enforce a foreign judgment
While the specific rules on recognition and declaration of enforceability are typically found in foreign legal instruments, the enforcement of judgments is governed by domestic, national rules.
According to the Hungarian Act on judicial enforcement procedure, the following procedural steps are necessary to enforce a foreign judgment in Hungary:
1. the creditor shall attach to the application for enforcement the foreign judgment to be enforced and, if necessary, at the request of the court, a Hungarian translation of the foreign judgment.
In case of an EU/EEA judgment, a) a copy of the EU /EEA judgment; and b) the certificate issued by the acting EU/EEA court confirming the enforceability and giving details of the judgment, e.g.: relevant information on the recoverable costs of the proceedings and the calculation of interest shall be attached.
2. If the foreign judgment is enforceable, the court issues an enforcement certificate for the foreign judgment, certifying that the judgment is enforceable under Hungarian law in the same way as the judgment of the domestic court; the court order may be appealed.
3. After an order has become final, the court shall issue an enforcement sheet on the basis of the foreign decision with a certificate of enforcement and shall send it to the court bailiff.
4. Based on the enforcement sheet, the court bailiff shall seize the debtor's assets.
[1] Act XXVIII of 2017 on private international law
-
CJEU DECISION IN A GDPR-RELATED CASE: DOES THE VIOLATION OF THE GDPR AUTOMATICALLY CONSTITUTE NON-MATERIAL DAMAGE?
Does the infringement of the data subjects’ rights by the controller give automatically rise to compensation? Can the controller be exempted from liability solely on the basis that the damage was the result of the fact that its employee did not comply with its instructions? What are decisive criteria to determine the amount of damages? In this article we analyse the fresh decision of the CJEU which addressed the previous questions.
Read more » -
HUNGARY – PERSONAL SCOPE EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY UNDER BRUSSELS IBIS
Does the principle of independence of the choice-of-court agreement require that parties shall expressly transfer the dispute resolution clause in case of transfer of the main contract? When can the personal scope of a jurisdiction agreement be extended to a non-signatory? A Hungarian appellate court decided upon these questions under the Brussels Ibis Regulation in a recent judgment
Read more » -
SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS IN HUNGARY
Given that there is no right of appeal in arbitration proceedings, it is important to be aware of what other legal remedies are available to you against an arbitral award. According to the Hungarian Arbitration Act, the parties may request the competent state court to set aside the award, which is a “mandatory” remedy, which cannot be waived by the parties in advance.
Read more »