Blog
Blog » DANGEROUS LIASONS? – THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION WITH EU LAW AND THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION
DANGEROUS LIASONS? – THE RELATION OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION WITH EU LAW AND THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTION
16 November 2023
Our managing partner, dr.Richard Schmidt LL.M was invited by the Legal Division of the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry and the Hungarian Commercial Arbitration Court to make a presentation on the sometimes stormy relation of international commercial arbitration with EU law and the European Convention of Human Rights.
The event was held on 9th November 2023, and it was opened by Dr. Lajosné Balog, Head of the Legal Division of the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, and by Dr. János Burai-Kovács, President of the Hungarian Commercial Arbitration Court, who stressed the importance of this topic both in domestic & international arbitration.
Introduction
Richard started his presentation by presenting the main characteristics of EU law and the European Convention of Human Rights, as supranational legal orders, and continued with the features of the judgments of the Strasbourg-based European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and the Luxemburg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
Richard after summarised the 3 (three) contemporary representations of international arbitration, namely the “seat theory”, which focuses on the seat of arbitration (mono-local theory), the “judgment theory”, which emphasizes the importance of the recognition of the arbitral award in other jurisdictions (multi-local theory), and finally the independent legal order theory, which conceives international arbitration as a distinct legal order.
The arbitration agreement
In the first part of the presentation, Richard summarised the case law of the Strasbourg court in relation with the arbitration agreement, starting from the doctrine of “partial waiver”, according to which the arbitration agreement shall be considered as a waiver of right to fair trail, enshrined by Article 6 (1) of the ECHR.
The presentation included the milestone judgments of the ECtHR in relation with the conditions of the waiver, and the limits of the waiver.
The arbitration procedure
The second part of the presentation dealt with the arbitral proceedings in front of the arbitral tribunal. In this phase the leading cases of the ECtHR in relation with such issues like tribunal formation, independence & impartiality of arbitrators, and the right to a judgment within reasonable time were presented.
After that Richard addressed the question, whether arbitral tribunals can ask preliminary questions from the CJEU, and highlighted practical situations, where arbitral tribunals face with the application of mandatory EU law (competition law, commercial agency, consumers, etc.)
Richard continued with the court proceedings connected with the arbitration procedure, especially the procedures for arbitrator appointment, the application for interim measures and anti-suit injunctions, where the most important cases of the CJEU were summarised.
The arbitral award
The settings aside and recognition & enforcement of arbitral award was the subject of the last part of the presentation. First, Richard addressed the question, whether the parties can waive their right to annul the arbitral award under the ECHR.
When it comes to recognition & enforcement of the arbitral award, Richard first dealt with the question to what extent these matters can be affected by the Brussels Ia Regulation in the light of the case law of CJEU.
After that he presented the milestone cases, where the ECtHR condemned states, who refused the enforcement of commercial arbitral awards.
Special thanks to Dr.Balog Lajosné and Dr.János Burai Kovács, for the invitation and to the Legal Division of the Hungarian Chamber of Commerce, the Hungarian Commercial Arbitration Court, and to the Hungarian Lawyer’s Association for organising this event.
-
CJEU DECISION IN A GDPR-RELATED CASE: DOES THE VIOLATION OF THE GDPR AUTOMATICALLY CONSTITUTE NON-MATERIAL DAMAGE?
Does the infringement of the data subjects’ rights by the controller give automatically rise to compensation? Can the controller be exempted from liability solely on the basis that the damage was the result of the fact that its employee did not comply with its instructions? What are decisive criteria to determine the amount of damages? In this article we analyse the fresh decision of the CJEU which addressed the previous questions.
Read more » -
HUNGARY – PERSONAL SCOPE EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY UNDER BRUSSELS IBIS
Does the principle of independence of the choice-of-court agreement require that parties shall expressly transfer the dispute resolution clause in case of transfer of the main contract? When can the personal scope of a jurisdiction agreement be extended to a non-signatory? A Hungarian appellate court decided upon these questions under the Brussels Ibis Regulation in a recent judgment
Read more » -
SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS IN HUNGARY
Given that there is no right of appeal in arbitration proceedings, it is important to be aware of what other legal remedies are available to you against an arbitral award. According to the Hungarian Arbitration Act, the parties may request the competent state court to set aside the award, which is a “mandatory” remedy, which cannot be waived by the parties in advance.
Read more »