Blog
Blog » TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYER IN HUNGARY -PART1/2
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BY EMPLOYER IN HUNGARY -PART1/2
15 December 2023
Termination of employment is a sensitive issue and can be the source of a labour law litigation, if done unlawfully. Unfortunately, there are many misunderstandings and myths in the common knowledge, such as the “three warnings”, which can mislead employers as well. In our two-part article we summarize what should the employer look out for, to execute the dismissal lawfully and thus avoid the unwanted legal consequences. In the first part we summarize the types of termination and the basic principles of the justification of dismissal by the employer. In the second article we summarize the cases which can serve as grounds for dismissal.
1. Types of termination
According to the Labour Code, the employment can be terminated by mutual agreement and by dismissal.
1.1. Termination by mutual agreement
The mutual agreement is a bilateral agreement, therefore it is only possible if both the employer and the employee are willing to agree on the termination of the relationship. Since it is an agreement, in which the parties accepts the terms, it is much safer from legal point of view compared to the dismissal, which is an unilateral statement binding on the other party even if it does not have the same intention.
It is also important that in the mutual agreement, the parties can decide the date of termination, and whether the employee receives any “exit bonus”, therefore, the parties can create a different scenario than what would be applicable in case of dismissal or resignation.
1.2. Termination by dismissal/resignation
Both the employer and the employee are entitled to unilaterally terminate the employment, if the circumstances set forth in the Labour Code and other sources (e.g. labour contract, company policies) are met.
Since dismissal/resignation is a unilateral legal statement, it does not require the acceptance of the other party, if executed correctly, it is effective upon communication to the addressee.
The most important difference is that while the employee generally does not have to justify his or her resignation, the employer, in most cases, is obliged to state the reasons for dismissing the employee, although there are exceptions in both cases.
2. Justification of the dismissal by the employer
From legal point of view, the most important part of the dismissal is the justification part, since missing, erroneous, or inadequate justification may easily result in wrongful termination.
First of all, there are four basic principles related to the justification, which are less known, but shall be carefully observed in all cases. Whatever the reason for the termination, the justification shall be:
Truthful |
|
Clear |
|
Relevant (reasonable) |
|
Timely |
|
In case the termination is based on multiple grounds considered together as a whole, each ground shall be valid and the inaccuracy of a single ground will lead to the unlawfulness of the termination.
Conversely, if it can be assumed from the justification that a single ground therein might serve as the basis for the termination, the termination will already be lawful if the court establishes the lawfulness of one ground.[5]
3. Formalities
It is also important that the employer shall execute the dismissal in a written statement (preferably in a printed document with wet signature). The legal consequence of the lack of written statement is special in labour law: the employment will be terminated anyway, however, the termination will be considered as wrongful, i.e the employee can claim compensation and other remedies stipulated in the Labour Code.
In the first part of our article, we have explained the mutual agreement, which shall reflect the free will of the parties to terminate the relationship. The dismissal/resignation is a unilateral agreement, which shall be executed in written form. In case the employer dismisses an employee, it shall state the reasons in most cases, which is the most important part of the notice of dismissal. Whatever is the ground, the justification shall be true, clear, relevant, and timely in all cases. If it is not the case, the dismissal is usually considered unlawful in labour lawsuits.
In the next part, we will examine what cases may serve as grounds for dismissal by the employer.
As you can see, the employer shall meet many legal criteria in connection with a dismissal, therefore, we always recommend the involvement of a legal expert with experience in labour law to avoid wrongful termination.
-
HUNGARY – PERSONAL SCOPE EXTENSION OF JURISDICTION CLAUSE TO NON-SIGNATORY UNDER BRUSSELS IBIS
Does the principle of independence of the choice-of-court agreement require that parties shall expressly transfer the dispute resolution clause in case of transfer of the main contract? When can the personal scope of a jurisdiction agreement be extended to a non-signatory? A Hungarian appellate court decided upon these questions under the Brussels Ibis Regulation in a recent judgment
Read more » -
SETTING ASIDE ARBITRAL AWARDS IN HUNGARY
Given that there is no right of appeal in arbitration proceedings, it is important to be aware of what other legal remedies are available to you against an arbitral award. According to the Hungarian Arbitration Act, the parties may request the competent state court to set aside the award, which is a “mandatory” remedy, which cannot be waived by the parties in advance.
Read more » -
HOW TO PROTECT YOUR BRAND WITH TRADEMARK IN HUNGARY AND IN THE EU
Trademark protection is a very simple but effective method to protect your company’s brand, including the business name, logo, slogan, and much more. If you are doing business in the EU, you have multiple options to acquire trademark protection. In case you want to know more about trademarks than the ™ and ® symbols, this short article will surely pique your interest.
Read more »